User talk:Drachenfireop

Recent edits to Drachen Fire
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Drachen Fire, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:40, 22 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi there, I wanted to explain to you what I did in my edit to the Drachen Fire article. On the history page, it would appear that I removed a lot of what you added, but what I did was group together the multiple use of the same source. Most of the references you added were used more than once, so rather than list the full citation multiple times we give the first use a group title and then put that group title instead of repeating the citation in full. This cut the amount of text in reference section in half but all citations are still there as you added. I know you're new here and it's possible the edit saying I removed over 2000 bytes of text could give the wrong impression, so I thought it best to give you a heads up on this. I also took out the "section" parameter as it was causing errors messages to appear in all the citations that it was included. I'm thinking that it's not a parameter that's used in that template or it meant something other than what you were using it for. Regardless, the section is much neater now. Cmr08 (talk) 01:43, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Big Bad Wolf
The reason why the details were trimmed has to do with WP:DUE, a policy that regulates content in several ways including "depth of detail". In this situation, the content you are in favor of including covers way too much ground in proportion to the rest of the article. Although the incident should be mentioned, it carries very little weight in terms of the scope of this article. Keep in mind that the topic is the coaster itself, and the incident should not consume too much space in the article. Feel free to discuss further here, on my talk page, or even better, at the article's talk page. We should avoid any form of edit warring and have a discussion at this point. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 21:53, 4 August 2015 (UTC)