User talk:Drachsi

Welcome!
helpme I have tried to create a page on Koloron, but it is protected, I have asked the admin why, but do not get a reply. --Drachsi 06:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hello, Drachsi. Your question has been answered at Talk:Koloron.  It appears that there have been several attempts to create an article with this name, but they have never been more than a dictionary definition (Koloron is the name in Esperanto for colour).  The article was protected to prevent future attempts at recreating a definition-only article.  It seems there is also a manufactured material named Koloron, however, and an article could conceivably be written about it.  Any such article would have to meet the guidelines at WP:CORP.  If you believe the article would meet those guidelines, then you could write the article in a subpage of your user space and then ask about getting the article unprotected so your article could be moved there.  Before you write the article, though, please familiarize yourself with the appropriate guidelines so you will know beforehand what is likely to be accepted as an article and what would be considered non-notable.  If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on my talk page.  Thank you.  SWAdair | Talk 07:13, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lensography
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lensography, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Neologism used on only one website.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 14:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Feedback
Your request for feedback at Requests for feedback/2011 May 16 has been replied to. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:40, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Drachsi/Website Reviews


A tag has been placed on User:Drachsi/Website Reviews requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DannyS712 (talk) 00:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)