User talk:Dracostav1325

Welcome!
Hello, Dracostav1325, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to K. B. Hedgewar. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 18:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

This is about the wikipedia article on jawaharlal nehru. amidst reports of vandalism on that article, it has been made semi protected for the time being, as I notice. however, a further vandalism and lie has been posted by the user Dominator1453 which you can check here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jawaharlal_Nehru&type=revision&diff=669475137&oldid=669447925

This was the edit(check right side of the page) : "According to a spokesperson from the Indian Congress, this page was edited to remove any citations of Jawaharlal Nehru being Muslim, by an account traced to the National Informatics Centre or NIC, the software provider of the government." which is now being shown on the wiki page. It is another malicious vandalism which states that the government of india treid to remove citations of nehru being a muslim, while the reality is that vandals(associated with the current government in India tried to insert lies about nehru BEING A MUSLIM(which he was not). check this link :

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wiki-entries-on-Nehru-family-edited-from-NIC-IP/articleshow/47888589.cms

It is well known that Nehru was a high caste kashmiri brahmin.

Request the wikipedia moderators to correct the malicious edits.

Dracostav1325 (talk) 13:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...

This is about the wikipedia article on jawaharlal nehru. amidst reports of vandalism on that article, it has been made semi protected for the time being, as I notice. however, a further vandalism and lie has been posted by the user Dominator1453 which you can check here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jawaharlal_Nehru&type=revision&diff=669475137&oldid=669447925

This was the edit(check right side of the page) : "According to a spokesperson from the Indian Congress, this page was edited to remove any citations of Jawaharlal Nehru being Muslim, by an account traced to the National Informatics Centre or NIC, the software provider of the government." which is now being shown on the wiki page. It is another malicious vandalism which states that the government of india treid to remove citations of nehru being a muslim, while the reality is that vandals(associated with the current government in India tried to insert lies about nehru BEING A MUSLIM(which he was not). check this link :

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wiki-entries-on-Nehru-family-edited-from-NIC-IP/articleshow/47888589.cms

It is well known that Nehru was a high caste kashmiri brahmin.

Request the wikipedia moderators to correct the malicious edits.

Dracostav1325 (talk) 13:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * , this is a discussion for the article's Talk page, not your own userspace. Primefac (talk) 13:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh does not have an edit summary.&#32;Many of your edits need justifications that should normally be provided in the edit summaries.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 22:28, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your addition to Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh is problematic, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:36, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to M. S. Golwalkar, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''You have reverted a recent clean-up of the article without explanation, and added synthesis from primary sources. Please refrain from doing this.'' Kautilya3 (talk) 13:06, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

ARBIPA notification
13:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=701670415 your edit] to Vinayak Damodar Savarkar may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:59, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 05:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Mercy Petitions of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mercy Petitions of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mercy Petitions of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Girdlast888 (talk) 22:17, 6 June 2018 (UTC)