User talk:DragonLegit04

Misleading edit summaries
Do not use false or misleading edit summaries, as you did in this edit as well as this edit. I have reverted them both because they were unconstructive edits that changed the meaning or removed valid information without any adequate explanation. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:08, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Where consensus?
Where was the concensus gained, which archive is it, because i looked, and all i saw was consensus that the criteria to be a major candidate shouldn't be changed, and he doesn't meet the criteria. LordEnma8 (talk) 00:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)


 * You can go into the edit history and view versions from June that show the consensus being built, initially the consensus was actually against adding Johnson but had shifted after his polling improved, leading to him being added in June. He meets 2 criteria (with only one being necessary for inclusion) - he has appeared in 5+ national polls (he is now included in almost every poll released), and he has received significant attention; being invited to multiple forums alongside candidates like DeSantis and even Trump himself, demonstrating that many consider him major enough to include. DragonLegit04 (talk) 01:06, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Since july, he has only been included in one poll. LordEnma8 (talk) 01:17, 4 August 2023 (UTC)