User talk:Dragonballz

Articles that already exist
I see you recently created the arcticle Yugi Muto / Yami Yugi (Atem). An article about that character already exists at Yugi Mutou. I have changed the page you created to a redirection page to point to the article that was already there. Before creating an article please search the Wikipedia and make sure the article does not already exist under a different name. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 20:04, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Image syntax and uploading
Please read this; it explains the image system, with which you appear to be struggling. I have reverted some the incorrect edits, so please work out the standard used around here before editing again. (you can always use the Sandbox to practice ;-)) Setokaiba✌≝ 20:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pauline Newstone
I have nominated Pauline Newstone, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Pauline Newstone. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. \ / (⁂) 08:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Dragonballz! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:51, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Darren Dunstan -

Speedy deletion nomination of Darren Dunstan
A tag has been placed on Darren Dunstan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ridernyc (talk) 17:46, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Darren Dunstan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darren Dunstan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Darren Dunstan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2020 (UTC)