User talk:Dragonich777

March 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Craig Fairbrass. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Teapot  george Talk  08:24, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Herman Li. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bento00 (talk) 00:38, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Regarding the article you created about yourself
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)  -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at XM29 OICW, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 10:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)