User talk:Dragontail308

Speedy deletion nomination of List of the Sikhs Hanged During Indian National Movement
Hello Dragontail308,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of the Sikhs Hanged During Indian National Movement for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tyrannosaurhex (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I have declined, for the time being, the deletion of this article but you really need to add a lead paragraph to it,now, explaining what the list is and what the criteria are for inclusion on the list.
 * You also need to be careful about the articles you are linking to. I've looked at the first three links in the section on Sikh Freedom Fighters (British Movement) and the people in the articles you linked to lived well into independence so I don't see how they could meet the criteria to be on this list. Nthep (talk) 15:03, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of the Sikhs Hanged During Indian National Movement
Hello, Dragontail308. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of the Sikhs Hanged During Indian National Movement, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tyrannosaurhex (talk) 15:29, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Gohalwar


A tag has been placed on Battle of Gohalwar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from URL. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jim in Georgia Contribs  Talk  22:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Sialkot (1763)
Hello Dragontail308,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Battle of Sialkot (1763) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Helenabella  (Talk)  05:31, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Gujranwala (1761)
Hello Dragontail308,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Battle of Gujranwala (1761) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Helenabella  (Talk)  05:31, 1 May 2015 (UTC)