User talk:Dragoonkain

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Monalscreenshot.png
Thanks for uploading File:Monalscreenshot.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 21:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 21:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Monalwebkit.png
Thanks for uploading File:Monalwebkit.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 21:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 21:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Gurkha
You will need to provide a reliable source that can be verified to support your post that the Royal Nepalese Army was seperate from the British Indian Army in World War Two. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. Please read Gurkha. The Royal Nepalese Army did not serve in WW2.--Woogie10w (talk) 10:50, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

I am using the official nepal army website as my source. They fought in WWII an WWI

http://www.nepalarmy.mil.np/history.php?page=four

--Dragoonkain (talk) 16:31, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, but it does not support your figure of 30,000 military dead. We need a source for that, all the figures must be supported by a reliable source that can be verified --Woogie10w (talk) 16:40, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

"More than 2, 00,000 most active and vigorous youths of the country were recruited for the British Gorkha army and taken away during the war period. Almost similar or number were recruited for the new combatants, police force and the private companies."

the 200,000 is in addition to the other 200,000 that served in the british gurkhas.


 * Thanks again, the book Prem R. Upreti- Nepal a small nation in the vortex of International Conflicts, Kathamadu : Pugo Mi, 1984 is at the New York Public Library. I plan to go there on Monday. There are also other books on the Gurkhas that I will check. It seems that Nepalese war dead are included with the Indian Army, we need to clarify this point.--Woogie10w (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

I think Gurkha dead are in the british dead but not Gorkha. The spelling makes a difference as one is the name of the British/indian regiment and the other is colloquial name for a Nepalese soldier--think GI. Please check and update the article with what you find. --Dragoonkain (talk) 17:08, 21 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I made an update @ WW2 Casualties based on the sources you provided. You have improved Wikipedia, thank you.--Woogie10w (talk) 17:58, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

The Nepalese Army casualties are in fact included with the Commonwealth ie:Indian Army. See this link to Nepalese casualties http://pipl.com/directory/name/Krishna/Bahadur   --Woogie10w (talk) 19:02, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:ChristianScienceNight.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:30, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Monal (software)


The article Monal (software) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable product spam."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Monal (emblem).png
Thanks for uploading File:Monal (emblem).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:55, 16 August 2021 (UTC)