User talk:Dragutinsparavalo

Welcome
Hi, Dragutinsparavalo. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!

For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.

Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 17:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation


I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beorama. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's an example of how to add references: Chzz is 98 years old.&lt;ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. &lt;/ref>

He likes tea.&lt;ref> Smith, John. " Interview with Chzz", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22.

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 17:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Then try WP:Yourfirstarticle, or you wait for your submission to be reviewed..although that may take some time.

Lectonar (talk) 17:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430  talk to me 19:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Stubovi kulture
Hi Dragutin, thanks for your email. I blocked User:Stubovi kulture because she was editing from a user name that violated our policy on user names. It is not permitted to use the name of a product or organisation, since that can be seen as promotion. Jelena Ristic is the PR manager with publishing house Stubovi kulture, and as such she made one edit, creating the article Stubovi kulture, which was tagged as advertising by another editor, and deleted as such by me. If she wishes to appeal against the block so that she can chose an acceptable user name, the procedure is described in the box on her talk page. Note that she would still not be allowed to edit articles about her magazine. I won't be involved in that decision anyway, because that wouldn't be fair to her.

If you are using the same computer, it suggests that you are an employee of the company, or otherwise closely connected to it. You can appeal in the same way by posting below this message. You can still edit this page.

''But it seems that Wikipedia in English doesn't allow other cultures to stand a chance in the process of globalization of culture. We can have our small national niche Wikipedias, but we are obviously unwelcome in English Wikipedia. Thank you for making that clear.'' &mdash; Please read this. If anything, I give editors whose first language is not English more leeway.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for further email. Just to clarify, I think it's unlikely that Jelena would be able to keep her current account name since it clearly contravenes the username policy, what she would be seeking would be a partial unblock to let her create a new username. As the block notice says, it is unlikely that she would be able to edit the article that got her into trouble in the first place. One of the commonest reasons for unblock requests to be refused is that the appellant clearly intends to go back to the problem article.


 * You may well be right that the magazine needs an article, but a new article would need to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines, and to be written in a non-promotional, neutral and encyclopaedic tone. The deleted version did neither.


 * I believe an article about Stubovi kulture in English would help promote internationally all fine authors Stubovi kulture published. &mdash; I find this sentence in your email a little worrying. The purpose of Wikipedia is emphatically not to promote anything. If authors are notable enough for articles, fine, but those articles need to meet the criteria in the previous paragraph. In practice, it's likely to be easier to get over the notability hurdle in a language like Serbian than it would be if writing in a world language like English, Spanish or French.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hallows AG  ( talk ) 08:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vladimir Krakov concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vladimir Krakov, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 04:37, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission sandbox


Hello Dragutinsparavalo. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled sandbox.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Denniss (talk) 19:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Vladimir Krakov
Please note that I moved the article to the mainspace.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beorama concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beorama, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beorama concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beorama, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 7 August 2014 (UTC)