User talk:Dramatommy136

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Brian Holden, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Brian Holden was changed by Dramatommy136 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.935297 on 2012-04-15T17:48:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:48, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Dramatommy136, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 18:27, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Holy Musical B@man! (musical)
Hi!

Just spotted this in our new pages patrol, and wanted to give you a few pointers on content.

For starters, citing the script, except for excerpts, is generally considered not a good thing - ditto with a summary of the musical here. Doing so makes the article seem promotional, and we are not here for promotions. What you can do is shorten the summary to help that out a bit - but you need to shorten it quite a lot, to be frank.

Second (and, instead of what's there)), what your best bet for the article will be is to hold to an explanation of why the play is notable. Doing a quick Google search, I was able to find a few news articles on this.  Being that the musical has only had one run thus far (last month), it may not quite fit those guidelines - but what I need you to do is get something together and show notability.  This is EXTREMELY important, as without this, we may seek to delete this article.

Third and finally, I don't know if this bears anything under the circumstances, but I'm vaguely concerned you may have a close connection to this play - which is something that is frowned upon if you're doing significant edits. It doesn't make you a bad editor, necessarily - but what this causes to happen is skewing from neutrality on any given subject. It is generally not possible to be so neutral when you're that close. On the other hand, it is far easier to bring in a neutral, objective point of view when one is not so closely connected to the subject. If I'm wrong, do forgive me - but do also note the necessity for neutrality.

Good luck, and happy editing.

-- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 18:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Holy Musical B@man!


The article Holy Musical B@man! has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * NO reliable third party sources to establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Killer Moff (talk) 11:43, 15 November 2016 (UTC)