User talk:Dravecky/Archive 9c

September 2009

Problems with KKXX-FM
Could you let me know if you have any problems when you click on KKXX-FM. Might need to watch that page, if someone is messing with it. Can't even get it to open to read about it.--JoeCool950 (talk) 04:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it's opening correctly now.--JoeCool950 (talk) 04:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I don't know what you were seeing but the last person to edit the page was you, way back on July 22nd. Glad it's all working now. - Dravecky (talk) 05:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 31 August 2009 ==


 * Flagged protection and patrolled revisions: Misleading media storm over flagged revisions
 * Flagged protection background: An extended look at how we got to flagged protection and patrolled revisions
 * Wikimania: Report on Wikimania 2009
 * News and notes: $2 million grant, new board members
 * Wikipedia in the news: WikiTrust, Azerbaijan-Armenia edit wars
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 16:20, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Deep-fried butter
Note to myself, create Deep-fried butter article. - Dravecky (talk) 11:12, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Still a redlink. Slacker. ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Still a redlink. Slacker. ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Still a redlink. Slacker. ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Still a redlink. Slacker. ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Still a redlink. Slacker. ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Still a redlink. Slacker. ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Still a redlink. Slacker. ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Still a redlink. Slacker. ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Still a redlink. Slacker. ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Still a redlink. Slacker. ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Happy Labor Day!
Dear colleague, I just want to wish you a happy, hopefully, extended holiday weekend and nice end to summer! Your friend, --A NobodyMy talk 06:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

GUTENSITE
I'd like to find out why you deleted the Gutensite article, and how I can at least get a copy of the deleted content. The article was deleted, so I don't see any notes of "why" it was deleted. I referenced a published work about Gutensite, etc. More information is available on the Talk Page of the article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gutensite). I'm not a wikipdedia expert, like you, so forgive me if I don't follow the protocol. I'm just trying to get to the bottom of the deletion. Chadwick Meyer 05:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Chadwickmeyer

Attempted Deletion Of KEWS-FM?
Hello There, I Noticed You attempted to Delete this radio station's article. This deeply saddened me. Im glad i caught it before the deed was done. I undid your deletion request. Please refrain from deleting that article. Also I had noticed you said the article was unverifiable, all you need to do to prove it is click on the website it provides.

Thank you LibertyNT (talk) 22:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I readded the tag. Shouldn't have been deleted, but if removed again it might then (or now if you are so inclined) to be moved to AfD. -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • 23:27, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * This is a non-notable, unlicensed "broadcaster" that has not been the subject of any third-party coverage in reliable sources and does not enjoy the general notability of licensed broadcast radio station. If the article is not improved in the next few days, it will be deleted through the proposed deletion process.  If the prod tag is removed without the article being improved, it will be taken to AfD where, based on years of precedent, it will almost certainly by deleted.  If you want this unlicensed station to have an article, you'll need to prove notability with references to news articles about this specific station. - Dravecky (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Dravecky, the user above removed the PROD tag again, so I took it one step further and nom'd it for deletion. I used part of what you posted on the PROD tag in the AfD, hope that was OK.  You can find it here. -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • 02:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I give up. Take it down. LibertyNT (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't take this the wrong way. I love radio station articles.  I've created hundreds of them and edited thousands more.  I've saved plenty from tagging and deletion and work very hard to keep them informative and up to date.  But since your micro-broadcaster has not been the subject of any news coverage it just doesn't meet the minimum threshold for inclusion in this encyclopedia. - Dravecky (talk) 12:52, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey no worries :) I completely understand when you say it like that. LibertyNT (talk) 22:06, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

 * From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
 * News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for Kady Malloy
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kady Malloy. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Facha93 (talk) 17:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

KUZZ
Thanks for updating the template. The user before me took off Tanya Steward. I corrected her name, because when it was typed, I misspelled her name, or had it spelled Tonya Steward. Thanks though, for putting the last name on there. I added the "T" in there like that, since that's the nickname they call her, but the Steward needed to be on there. You can let me know if it's o.k. to have it as Tanya "T" with her last name after that. I guess it's o.k. But, definitely need to know, that it's the same person on there. The user that took her name off, I left them a message letting them know that Tanya still works for KUZZ. Just wanted to say thanks though. One of the users on KDFO tried to switch the programming the way it was written. I changed it back to how it was. They tried to change it to an actual schedule again, which is a No No on wikipedia, so undid it and changed it back. Amazing how some people will change stuff on Wikipedia though, without knowing the rules. I can promise you though, I won't change whatever you do. If you make any changes, it's for good reason.--JoeCool950 (talk) 07:27, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

KDUV
I forgot that was still in there about Dale Best, when I updated the programming part. Should have taken it out. It made it sound like Dale Best just made the move. He's been on the station now for awhile. Thanks for catching that. I just learned something. If I make an update on anything, especially in the programming, always put in the Edit summary (Description updated), so that Wikipedia knows what your doing. That's one thing I got to still work on is leaving an Edit summary. Although, if there's something that needs to be undone. I'll use KDFO for example, if you want to look, but if something needs to be undone, like what the user before me recently did, if you look at what that person did, and I couldn't redue where he started from at the beginning, then what can you put in the Edit summary to show that your undoing what that particular user did? Hopefully, you that question makes sense.--JoeCool950 (talk) 07:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

 * Opinion essay: White Barbarian
 * Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
 * Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
 * News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:34, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Vandal
On Roman Kingdom we have a malicious vandal 199.243.125.2 that is also vandalizing many other articles. Can you fix him? Thanks! --Doug Coldwell talk 14:27, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It got fixed. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell talk 14:29, 30 September 2009 (UTC)