User talk:Drcheech/sandbox

Peer review for interstitial nephritis article
1. What does the article do well? '''2. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?''' 3. What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? 4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?
 * I like that you plan to add in pictures
 * Your outline seems very easy logical and complete
 * Consider moving epidemiology earlier in the article so people have an idea as to why the disease process is important
 * Add all of your proposals to the article as the current article seems scarce
 * I should find some pictures to add in

Looking forward to reading this updated article! Hwoollen16 (talk) 23:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Peer review for interstitial nephritis article
1. What does the article do well?

You have a good start on the lead section, it's more informative than what is currently in the interstitial nephritis article. I also like the outline you have set up for the article.

2. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article?

This may be personal preference, but after the lead section I would like to see the History of the disease before you get into the medical aspects of it.

3. What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

Keep building on the outline.

4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Outlining the sections prior to adding/editing to ensure the article I cohesive.

Looks like a good start! Tbeckwi (talk) 02:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)