User talk:Drchriswilliams/Archive 6

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate
Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
 * Publish an article to the journal.
 * Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
 * Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
 * Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
 * Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
 * Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
 * Join the editorial board.
 * Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
 * Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
 * Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
 * Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
 * Technical work like template designing for the journal.
 * Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to . If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at.
 * Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

 D ip ta ns hu Talk 13:43, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ben Nevis into Ben Nevis Race. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice. It is unusual for me to create an article in this manner, so I didn't think to use the template to give extended details. I have made use of the template now. Drchriswilliams (talk) 22:21, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Accent related edits
Thank you very much for your notice regarding removal of edits related to accents. Another user, Mr. Kebab, directed me to the following Wikipedia policy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion

"Advertising, marketing or public relations. Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery. All article topics must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify notable organizations which are the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See also Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting causes or events, or issuing public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so."

I believe that my edits are in compliance with the policy because they objectively state that several software packages are popular, (which can be seen from their rankings in the apple store), not that they are good or bad or that one is better than the other. In addition, they do not constitute advertising, marketing or public relations because they list several competing products, and also the alternative of live speech therapy sessions. They are on point and enhance the information content of the articles, since the Wikipedia articles relate to accents, potential disadvantages of foreign or regional accents, and efforts to modify accents.

If you feel that they do not belong in some particular articles, perhaps it would make sense to remove them from some but not from all of the articles, or to move them to a less prominent location within the articles. I feel that wholesale removal is unwarranted given their relevance to the subject matter of the articles and compliance with Wikipedia policies on tone and style.

Happy to continue the conversation with you and Mr. Kebab.

--EngTutor (talk) 22:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Also, if you notice other Wikipedia articles include lists of popular software, such as the article on Word-processing, [|spreadsheets], Optical Character Recognition, voice recognition, and so on. The inclusion of lists of software is analogous to the list of speech trainer organizations which already appears in the accent reduction article.

--EngTutor (talk) 23:05, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * You seem willing to acknowledge that these external links were added in a prominent position, across multiple articles. You added links that "primarily exist to sell products or services", as covered by WP:ELNO. As well as adding these links, you also added descriptions that appear promotional. Four different editors have reverted your edits. Your edits are not compliant with the Wikipedia policies that and I have directed you towards. Drchriswilliams (talk) 23:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for your comments and the additional policy links.


 * If you believe that the links are relevant to some articles, but not others, then let us discuss which articles they are most relevant to. The Accent Reduction article already includes a list of Speech Trainer organizations, which seems to be analogous to a list of software that accomplishes much the same thing. Would a reasonable compromise be to include the list of software in the Accent Reduction article, but not the other articles?


 * If you believe that the word "popular" is promotional, it can be removed so that the edit would simply read:


 * Accents can be "reduced" or made to sound more like native speakers with practice during speech therapy sessions, or with the assistance of software that guides users through exercises. Both approaches typically involve pronunciation exercises focusing on commonly mispronounced words and sounds, and with frequent feedback. Software for learning standard North American pronunciation of English includes: Accent Perfect, American Accent Made Easy, and American Accent.


 * If you believe that the location is too prominent, would a reasonable compromise be to move the text to the training section?


 * The policy above, "Advertising, marketing or public relations. Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery" suggests that information about commercial products can be included if it strikes the right tone and contains objective informational content. The Spam policy prohibits promotional tracking links, but none of the links are promotional tracking links.


 * If the text only appears in one of the articles, alongside the pre-existing list of training organizations, without the ostensibly "promotional" word "popular", would that be a satisfactory resolution?


 * I think the fact that software is available for accent reduction is every bit as relevant to an accent reduction article as the fact that speech trainers are available, just as an article about math would note the availability of mathematical software rather than hand calculation.

--EngTutor (talk) 23:30, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alain Baxter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slalom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Beach Walking
You have removed the technique of Beach Walking and the Technical Advices. I do not offer advices. Technical Advices are in this website: 11 Tips for Better Beach Walking (Wendy Bumgardner. Verywell.Com) https://www.verywell.com/tips-for-walking-on-the-beach-4065400 --Beach run do (talk) 10:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Could I ask for your attention
In Articles for deletion/Chaetophobia it's being asserted that (a) these phobias are listed in the DSM, and (b) that this is sufficient evidence of notability. I'm dubious about this, but I'm looking for opinions from people who are more expert than I. Mangoe (talk) 22:14, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Tagging Sarman singh
The article on Sarman singh meets wikipedia rules, check out WP:PROF.Thanks a lot, User:Cansas89 —Preceding undated comment added 06:04, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I applied maintenance tag to indicate that there are problems with this article. They should not be removed until the concerns are resolved. Adding one or two self-published sources is not a means of resolving these issues. Drchriswilliams (talk) 06:23, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I have added some independent links, reliable resources, links of national and international journals. Membership profile on World Health Organization Website too. Check out and decide. Thanks a lot. User:Cansas89 —Preceding undated comment added 06:56, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of University of Dundee Medical School
Hello! Your submission of University of Dundee Medical School at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  10:58, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey Drchriswilliams, forgot to ping you in the DYK review and hence this message. Just wanted to let you know that I have finished the DYK check. All the best and happy editing. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  11:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 00:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

DYK for K2 (tax scheme)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi
Are you male or female? Just asking. Thanks Wythy (talk) 19:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * was your question relating to any edit in particular? Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:52, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * No. Wythy (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

The 10,000 Challenge
Hi. I've noticed the good work you do on here. I was wondering if you'd be interested in contributing to this ambitious British Isles challenge to bringing about 10,000 improvements to the UK and Ireland. The drive is fuelled by regional contests every few months, but it is generally an ongoing content improvement development. If you'd be interested in chipping in with the articles you improve please add your name to the participants and start adding your entries to the big list. Diversity of input will make it much more interesting to peruse! Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld  08:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

The 10,000 Challenge
Hi, at The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

DYK for University of Dundee School of Medicine
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

University of Stirling
Hi Chris, thanks for your edits to the page. I'm new to Wikipedia and finding it very difficult to understand sourcing, etc. Is it your job to update Wikipedia and why do you take interest in certain pages? I thought secondary sources would include news outlets which is why I amended references to the likes of Telegraph rather than the primary website. Was else can be referenced? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corriec (talk • contribs) 09:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Corrie, I'm not employed to edit Wikipedia. I have edited many university-related articles and am part of the WikiProject Universities which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of university-related topics. Over the months there have been multiple changes to the article on the University of Stirling that have introduced material that appears promotional. At the same time some of the links that have been added are far from ideal as they are consider self-sourced, see WP:SELFSOURCE. Wikipedia is not an extension of the University's website. Articles on Wikipedia should use material that has been reliably sourced, which is covered by the policy on WP:RS. This is reflected in advice about content, such as Wikipedia:College and university article advice. Drchriswilliams (talk) 11:28, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Another copyvio at Bitcoin
Hi, there was yet another copyright violation at Bitcoin violating the copyright of Time Inc. starting by this edit directly copying text from this article. In this edit I removed the copied text. I guess that you are better versed than me how these cases shall be handled. Thanks for any help. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 08:44, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Canvassing other editors. Ladislav has so far brought me to 3 drama boards, all the issues were thrown out. No copy vio. No copy paste. Because as a bitcoin advocate he is doing all he can to control a very dumbed down article. I requeasted you stop posting on my talk page. Earl King (talk) 14:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)