User talk:Drdak

License tagging for Image:1stsgt.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:1stsgt.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 22:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:MarineMilitaryAcademysm.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MarineMilitaryAcademysm.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 02:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Military12.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Military12.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 04:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Military12.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Military12.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr/talk 15:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Military12.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Military12.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr/talk 15:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Military12.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Military12.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr/talk 15:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MarineMilitaryAcademysm.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:MarineMilitaryAcademysm.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Problems with upload of Image:Ministries us edu stanthony.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Ministries us edu stanthony.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:1stsgt.gif
Thank you for uploading File:1stsgt.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

June 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Alex Jones (radio host). Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 02:49, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * What? No I was not in an edit war with you, we were editing at the same time. By the way, could you explain where all the information on Michelle Malkin went? If the "aggressive" adjective was not in the citation then delete it, don't delete the whole section (especially when it is well documented).--Drdak (talk) 00:51, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Uniform of the day


The article Uniform of the day has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * 4 1/2 year old unref article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lionel (talk) 23:25, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * If you are interested in the sources of a current article please ask for references and leave a tag on the page instead of proposing its deletion. The topic discussed in the article does exist. I will post a request for references.--Drdak (talk) 04:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cara Hartmann


The article Cara Hartmann has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * '''Uh, individual fails notabiltiy guidelines quite resoundingly. Uploading 5 youtube videos does not seem very signficiant :) References are trivial - although the mail goes into more detail it only relates to the video and has little to do with the biography.

If treated a little more widely this may be deserving a place in internet hits, or internet meme's etc. But as a biography... no.'''

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Errant (chat!) 12:21, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Cara Hartmann for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cara Hartmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cara Hartmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Errant (chat!) 21:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

GOP
Months-old, dead discussions have no bearing on a future or current consensus-building discussion. Ergo, you should start a new thread if you want to attempt to change the current consensus revision. Toa   Nidhiki  05  23:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Is there anything in Consensus that says that opinions in previous threads don't count?--Drdak (talk) 23:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It is common sense they don't. Consensus isn't built on old comments and month-old threads, it is based on current actions.  Toa   Nidhiki  05  23:45, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Please show me why we have a certain allotted time to get people's opinions in before they "expire". Last I understood there is no time limit on consensus-building.--Drdak (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * For God's sake, we don't count month-old comments from dead discussions for current consensus. It simply doesn't work like that. If you seriously want to go down this road again, start a new thread.  Toa   Nidhiki  05  23:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Lebanese nationality law
The article Lebanese nationality law needs more reliable and up-to-date information. If you are interested you can contribute to it. Thanks in advance.

Radartoothth (talk) 23:32, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Lebanese passport
The article Lebanese passport needs more reliable and up-to-date information. If you are interested you can contribute to it. Thanks in advance.

Radartoothth (talk) 23:32, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Re:
Not sure what page you are looking at but the consensus is to remove the field, not change to what you wanted. The warning is inappropriate and against what is actually going on, so please stop.  Toa   Nidhiki05  20:46, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Welcome to Briarcliff, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fetish and FX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tricks and Treats (American Horror Story: Asylum), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extra-terrestrial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:19, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Texas at San Antonio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WOAI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Unfortunately, I've had to decline your request for rollback. You just do not have enough edits in vandalism patrol yet. Fortunately, and coincidently, I also live in San Antonio and recently put together the Wikipedia takes America here in San Antonio. If you would like to be invited to the next one, simply add your name below. Also be sure to join the San Antonio Wikiproject at WP:San Antonio.--v/r - TP 20:38, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the information. While I don't agree with the decision, I respect it. I've been meaning to get much more involved with the San Antonio Task Force lately. As soon as I finish my work on the UTSA article I plan to work on more city-centric ones. I'll be seeing you around.--Ðrdak (T) 09:44, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks a lot for your inspiring barnstar! Sure enough, if I have time I will keep haunting the GAN page and picking up reviews :D. Sainsf &lt;^&gt; Talk all words 12:17, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Separation of money and state
Dear Drdak

First, how do I join your Liberalism Task Force? I think your contributions are important and I would like to participate.

Second, I would like draw your attention to the following point: before yesterday, Wikipedia lacked an article about the liberal proposition of separating money and state.

Free banking, Currency competition, and Legal tender all have articles. There are even redundant articles about complemetary currencies (one two three four).

As you know, non-involvement of the government in monetary affairs implies free banking but is not implied by it. Free banking is a hyponym of money/state separation: it can exist in an environment when a (commodity/paper) government currency competes with private currencies. As the government would levy taxes in its own currency, it would benefit from an undue monopolistic advantage despite the free banking environment. Hayek and Rothbard clearly advocated total abolition of government control over monetary affairs, rather than mere abolition of legal tender laws.

Furthermore, the debt crisis, and recent headlines about Bitcoin and the Liberty Dollar, have renewed the proposition. The reference to church/state separation was initially made by Hayek (to my knowledge) but has been repeated recently (I have repeatedly read it recently, and I'm still looking for more references).

Anyhow, I have taken the initiative of creating such an article.

I would very much appreciate your contribution to help me source and expand the article. This would be especially useful as it seems the requirements in that regard are much more stringent if one doesn't describe the Krugman/Bernanke precepts.

Thank you !

Alfy32 (talk) 22:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi Alfy! I'll be sure to take a look at it. To join the Liberalism Task Force be sure to first join WikiProject Politics. We operate under that!--Ðrdak (T) 09:37, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=563024245 your edit] to University of Texas at San Antonio may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:25, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alpha Sigma Rho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calla lily (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alpha Sigma Rho


The article Alpha Sigma Rho has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Can't find that this meets WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alpha Sigma Rho crest.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Alpha Sigma Rho crest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Your comment at Talk:American Left about the Democratic party
Hi Drdak. I thought your comment at  about the Democratic party being viewed as centrist from an unbiased outsider's perspective was pretty close to spot on. It helped me decide to head to the library for some corrections that I attempted to make at that article in February. Check out my user page for the amusing details. Flying Jazz (talk) 15:27, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Looking for more informed assistance/opinions regarding the political position of the Republican Party (US)
Hi I saw that you were a member WikiProject Politics, and was wondering if you'd be willing to give input/assistance on a task I've set out to do on changing the consensus regarding the political position (or rather lack thereof) on the Republican Party (United States) page. If you're interested, you can participate (either by stating your opinion, or responding to others regarding inaccuracies, etc) on the talk page. Thanks!  HapHaxion  (talk / contribs) 20:07, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Texas at San Antonio Seal.png
Thanks for uploading File:University of Texas at San Antonio Seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. :) -- &#61;*&#61; XHCN Quang Minh &#61;*&#61; (talk) 04:28, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Frost Tower
Hi, I redirected your article to Frost Bank Tower (San Antonio). If something has an alternate name, we use redirects rather than creating an article for each name and linking them. JamesG5 (talk) 20:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

In this particular instance we have a new tower (called "Frost Tower") and the old tower, which is still named "Frost Bank Tower", but they're both in San Antonio. --Ðrdak (T) 21:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I see. The issue is that you posted the article as a stub with no links or references, and you linked it in the original article, so that comes up when someone does a Google search.  It's never a good idea to post an article without references & links, especially when it's a stub.  What I'll do is remove the redirect and convert it to a Draft so you can improve it before moving it to the main space. JamesG5 (talk) 23:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * OK, the article is now at Draft:Frost_Tower. Please take some time to add references & links, then I can help you move it to main space. JamesG5 (talk) 23:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stanthony-logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Stanthony-logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Frost Tower


Hello, Drdak. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frost Tower".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 11:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Uniform of the day for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uniform of the day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Uniform of the day until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:31, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Stereotypes of Lebanese people for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stereotypes of Lebanese people, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Stereotypes of Lebanese people until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rowdy the Roadrunner.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rowdy the Roadrunner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kinu t/c 18:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)