User talk:DreaDuckett

Notability of Julius Bloomfield
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Julius Bloomfield, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Julius Bloomfield seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Julius Bloomfield, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I wanted to point you at the specific policy that was being referred to here: it is WP:POLITICIAN. I can't see any other assertion that would provide sufficient notability to retain this article, and the gentleman doesn't seem to meet the requirements of the political guidelines. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a note. Accounting4Taste: talk 19:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)