User talk:DreaK89/sandbox

potential sources https://doi.org/10.1080/13501670902750303 (Mikhail Mitsel (2009) The final chapter: Agro‐Joint workers – victims of the Great Terror in the USSR, 1937–40, East European Jewish Affairs, 39:1, 79-99) https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2010.489254 (Michael Ellman (2010) Regional Influences on the Formulation and Implementation of NKVD Order 00447, Europe-Asia Studies, 62:6, 915-931, DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2010.489254) http://www.sciencespo.fr/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance/en/document/kurapaty-1937-1941-nkvd-mass-killings-soviet-belarus McCauley, Martin (2008). Stalin and Stalinism (revised 3rd ed.). Pearson Education Limited

DreaK89 (talk) 08:29, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Review
For Katyn Massacre, there was a great amount of information and a few short sentences. Great job! Checking out your sources, another good job, having peer reviewed journals. The content comes very factual and well balanced, not showing any bias. As I can see your group is still working on this, you are on a great path so far. Good job! Carr63 (talk) 17:29, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
Can insert link for topics like the Great Purge and Mikhail Gorbachev. Think of it as if someone is reading about this for the first time so the internal links could make it easier to understand the article better. unless of course it is already talked about in more depth in the original article. Can expand more as to why the Katyn Massacre happened. Overall, both sections have a good amount of detail with good source.

RS92194 (talk) 20:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

O'Shea Review
It looks like you are off to a good start. My only suggestion is to have as many good sources for your information possible. In my article I have been diving through the 17 moments articles finding as much information as I can. The article is well balanced so far and doesnt seem to be biased yet. Macbookoshea (talk) 22:11, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
This seems like a great start for your article. I would like to see a lead section in the future just so the reader will know what to expect without reading the entire article. So far it looks good and you have been able to find some really nice sources. Good Work! CalebElswick (talk) 22:51, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Kennjones Peer Review
First off, what an interesting subject to dive into. From the looks of it, you haven't had much in the way of teamwork, but I like the direction your contributions are heading. I think the Katyn Massacre is well sourced, and it was presented in a pretty neutral and clear way. The section titled "The American Jewish Joint Agricultural Cooperation and Birobidzhan (Jewish Autonomous Region)" is well written, but may need another, supporting source. The source is reliable, but it is doing a lot of the work. I made a few grammar/ spelling edits to help out. All in all, great start, can't wait to see where it goes.Kennjones (talk) 02:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)