User talk:Dreadstar/Temp response

This page is not meant to be edited and will be deleted once the related AN case is closed. This is in response to SMcCandlish's request to me regarding evidence of their attacks and aspersion casting on others here: I created this temporary subpage to answer the question in a way that does not unduly disrupt the entire discussion on AN:

These are attacks and aspersions by SMcCandlish on others just in that one AN section:


 * "everyone with a personality conflict with me tends to dogpile me emotively at ANI and other process pages, and tend to canvas each other to do so [1], as well as engage in shameless personal attacks all against me all over Wikipedia, which never, ever have any consequences for them for some reason, not matter how baldfaced they are"


 * "I don't think the fact that I can be abrasive sometimes really justifies the vitriolic treatment I get at AN/ANI/AE almost every time (not that there's many times, but they sure are memorable, rather like being thrashed by a mob"
 * "Many now indef-blocked, perpetually disruptive, system-gaming WP:CIVILPOV pushers and other forms of editwarrior, who were clearly WP:NOTHERE to do anything useful, have been treated with far more respect and good faith than I usually get in such proceedings, until they were indef'ed, usually regretfully and after enormous amounts of deferential giving of the benefit of the doubt, which I never get (nor do any other MOS/AT regulars; there's a clear "wikiprojects should do whatever they want autonomously", anti-consistency bias growing in ANI and especially in AE"


 * "I was tendentiously hauled in front of ANI again, where the complainant didn't get boomerang sanctioned or even slightly criticized, despite the patent vexatiousness of the endeavor"
 * "Blatant assumption of bad faith, backed up by nothing at all."
 * "Montanabw does not have any special right to personal notification of moves of articles that the editor has no connection to
 * "This editor habitually engages in personal attacks against me, despite prior productive collaboration a few years ago (and directly against the position of Montanabw's new wikifriend, and my current biggest detractor, Justlettersandnumbers [2] – anyone else feel this is all about interpersonal drama? Note Montanabw's characterization of well-reasoned policy disputes between me and Jlan as a "spat", into which Montanbw has chosen a side for the exact opposite of Wikipedia-helpful reason. This is not a good sign"


 * This entire rant is full of attacks and aspersions, starting with “blatant assumptions” and degenerating into a wall of text rant from there…is this really helpful to getting your ban shortened? I don’t think so.


 * Additionally, SMcCandlish attacks MontanaBW several more times, which even if the basis for the attacks is justified, the attacks themselves are distasteful and unnecessary in your attempt to get their ban reduced. Odd way to go about it.