User talk:Dream-seeker74

Derek McCulloch
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Derek McCulloch. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 195.92.109.20 (talk) 10:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I've left your latest blanking of the page unreverted due to the reasonable point you raise about the reliability of "Aunt Gwyneth".


 * However please note that, regrettable though the allegations undoubtedly are to your family, alone it would not constitute grounds for removing such material - as per WP:NOTCENSORED


 * I have raised this as an issue on the talk page. Other editors may take a different view from myself.  You may be advised to contribute to this discussion if you do not wish this material to re-appear on the page 195.92.109.20 (talk) 12:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Please don't keep removing this as it could lead to a WP:BLOCK. It is better to raise the issue on the talk page, or to follow the suggestions at dispute resolution.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 11:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Derek McCulloch shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:12, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * There is a discussion at WP:BLPN that you might be interested in. Regards, GiantSnowman 11:31, 30 October 2012 (UTC)