User talk:Dreamnikhil

August 2012
Hello, I'm Krzna. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Gabbar Singh (film)‎ seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Krzna (talk) 06:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dookudu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Krzna (talk) 06:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pawan Kalyan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. krZna (talk) 19:07, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Image
Hello there, and welcome. Please tell me the source of this image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pawan_n.jpg

Where did you get it from?

Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Nithya Menen ‎, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Pawan Kalyan. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''You're headed for a block on Commons for repeated copyright violations (and would also be blockable here on EN.WP if you continue to do it here). And repeated contradiction of cited refs and removal of content you seem not to like (despite being supported by cited refs, and being encyclopediac details of article subject) will also lead to a block here on EN.WP.'' DMacks (talk) 08:43, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 11:56, 10 October 2015 (UTC)