User talk:Drendgame

Reverted your edit in Falsifiability
Thank you for your attempt to improve the article Falsifiability. You can discuss in the talk page of the article if you think you have an idea how to explain better what it is. A very fundamental, in fact, essential aspect of falsifiability is that it is a logical criterion of classical logic. In classical logic, a theory is either contradicted by a statement or not. It's very simple: it's a contradiction or it's not. Another key ingredient of falsifiability is that the contradictory observation statement, the falsifier, must have an empirical interpretation, which may be actually the case or not. So, there is a falsification (with an actual experiment) that is able to occur, but that is not falsifiability. It's important that falsifiability is a logical criterion. This separation between the logical level and the concrete methodological level is why falsifiability works and avoids many pitfalls. A lead that would not convey that would be completely besides the point. Dominic Mayers (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2021 (UTC)