User talk:Drenner

Cob ball
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cob ball, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Cob ball. Accounting4Taste: talk 01:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Cob ball userfied
Hi. I have deleted the Cob ball article that you created because as it stood it clearly violated Wikipedia's No original research policy. However, in view of your comments on its talk page, I have "userfied" its content to your user-space - it's now at User:Drenner/Cob ball. This means it's not part of the encyclopedia any longer, but if you want to do further research on the subject to find reliable sources for it (on-line or paper), you can do so; and if you can later show that the subject is verifiable and notable enough for inclusion, please submit it again. Hope this is clear, but let me know if you have any questions. Best, —S MALL  JIM   13:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)