User talk:Drew Carver1/sandbox

Drew's Peer Review

I do like the number of examples used in this article, however, I feel it relies too much on them, and you should include other things, such as what you think of the article in its current state, and what other things you can do to improve it.

Drew's peer review
This was honestly something I have never heard of before, and I usually am quite up to date and familiar with most Cybersecurity topics. Overall I found this to be a quite well written summary. It could benefit from being broken up a bit more, but overall it was solid. The next section was also okay, but I did not entirely like the vagueness of the standpoints, ethically technologically, and societal. I would have appreciated a little more in-depth explanations for those. And finally, the third section is easily the best part. I took a look at the article myself and found that it did not delve into much detail into specific instances (likely why I found your summary to be a bit lacking in there as well), and I also believe most people learn via experience, and not just hypotheticals. Documenting past experience with this specific type of attack would be useful, but I also think providing a small history of the topic (where it first came from, what caused it, what most vulnerabilities are, etc) would also be quite beneficial aside from just providing real life examples. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Baratta (talk • contribs) 03:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)