User talk:Drewboy1111

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Regards, Accurizer 14:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Article space vs. user space
Hello! Andrew Bryant is not the appropriate spot to post information about yourself, because that's the encyclopedic part of the Wikipedia website. User:, however, is all yours to use more or less as you wish. Please see Introduction and User page for more information. A tag has been placed on Andrew Bryant, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Andrew Bryant is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Andrew Bryant. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. Regards, Accurizer 14:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello - in regards to the above, I happened to be in watch and already went and deleted the article under speedy deletion criteria, especially since the article in question didn't contain any assertion, let alone proof, of notability of the subject. It may be that there may have not been enough time to react to this warning, and for that, I apologise. If you feel I've acted too hastily (it happens!) and the person in question is, in fact, notable under the policy set forth in biography notability, I'll be more than happy to restore it on the condition that some notability is asserted (and very much preferrably sourced) this time. Or, you can simply recreate the article - this time with (again, sourced) assertions of notability. Again, unless there are assertions of any kind of notability, articles may get deleted on sight, and if articles don't meet notability criteria, they may get deleted through the deletion process. But if this was about yourself, I suggest using your user page (User:Drewboy1111) for self-biographical stuff instead. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)