User talk:Drgyen

Tenebrous (Marvel comics)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tenebrous (Marvel comics), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Aegis (Lady of All Sorrows). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Stub or Expand?
Hi, The stub tag is only used when a whole article is a stub. If you want to comment on a particular section, as you've done in List of 1632 characters, please use. Thanks. PamD (talk) 22:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * You've done it again with List of secondary characters from The Venture Bros. - please use the right tag. Thanks. PamD (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Sorry, please ignore this warning. I accidentally hit warn/revert on Huggle and when I tried to undo the action it crashed. » skraz talk,contribs 05:47, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Film cast lists
Per the consensus of the Films project and the Film MoS, cast lists should be done as bullet lists, not table. See the MoS talk page for a recent discussion about this very issue. Please discontinue converting lists to tables, I have reverted your recent edits doing this. Thanks. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 13:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 1632 series battles
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is 1632 series battles. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/1632 series battles. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 1632 institutions
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is 1632 institutions. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/1632 institutions. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 1632 places and others
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are 1632 places, Mike Stearns. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Articles for deletion/1632 places for 1632 places, Articles for deletion/Mike Stearns for Mike Stearns. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:46, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 1635: The Dreeson Incident


The article 1635: The Dreeson Incident has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: 1635: The Dreeson Incident – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 08:50, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Out of the Dark
Thank for your edit to the Out of the Dark article. Do you happen to have an electronic copy of it? I've been wanting to read it ever since I found out about it. Debresser (talk) 09:33, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you kindly, I got it from downloading a scan on the Internet. You don't happen to have an account for amazon.com in order to get an e-book of the book?--Drgyen (talk) 04:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nope. :) Well, perhaps you'd send it to be? My email is on my userpage. Debresser (talk) 09:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of 1632 characters (fictional) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of 1632 characters (fictional) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of 1632 characters (fictional) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 02:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Tenebrous (Marvel Comics) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tenebrous (Marvel Comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tenebrous (Marvel Comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 04:32, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of 1632 characters (fictional) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of 1632 characters (fictional) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of 1632 characters (fictional)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:08, 19 August 2022 (UTC)