User talk:Drhunterhamilton21

January 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Oknazevad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. oknazevad (talk) 02:59, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Frozen (2013 film). Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: based on CU information this is probably not a compromised account. Mz7 (talk) 22:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Good to know. The contribution history shows a marked change of behavior for the last few edits, which suggested to me a compromised account. As a compromised account, it cannot be unblocked anyway. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Appeal
It wasn't just a user page you vandalized. And you don't need to address me. Another administrator has to decide whether you are to remain blocked. The fact that you so easily lost your temper over a simple guideline-compliant revert (explained adequately in the reverter's edit summary) doesn't fill me with confidence about what would happen moving forward if you were unblocked and then experienced another small altercation. Making bold edits and being reverted is part of participating on Wikipedia, and you need to be emotionally equipped to handle that with grace and maturity. Disputes and disagreements abound here. You need to convince the reviewing administrator that unblocking you would be a net benefit to the Wikipedia project, instead of creating clean-up work for others. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Reply
Ok I won't come back for another 6 months thanks for giving me a suggestionDrhunterhamilton21 (talk) 03:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Appeal & Taking Responsibility

 * Thank you for your apology. You also need to explain the multiple accounts you have created. And you did state above that you would wait six months and then appeal your block per Standard offer.
 * Reviewing admin: please also see the appeal from an account claiming to be this user's father on my talk page at User talk:Anachronist. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Apology to Oknazevad
Dear ,

I'm so sorry for vandalizing your page several times and I knew I should've talked to you asking not to cause any editing conflicts with me but I was stupid and vandalized your page multiple times and now I deeply regret doing that and I should not be forgiven for doing that. Next time can you please not blow my work from wikipedia off next time?

Thank you!

Ideas for Wikipedia Adminship
When I looked at the requirements to be a Wikipedia administrator it said that there are no official requirements to be a Wikipedia administrator. So I think to make a Wikipedia user an administrator and show them they’re trustworthy enough to be granted adminship, I have some ideas for requirements to get adminship from Wikipedia.


 * '''Ideas for Requirements for Adminship on Wikipedia:

1. The Wikipedia user must be registered for at least 5 years.

2. The Wikipedia user must not have been blocked by another Wikipedia administrator.

3. The Wikipedia user must have made at least 10,000 edits.


 * None of those are administrator criteria, nor should they be. Some admins have demonstrated their abilities after only a year in, many have been blocked in their early days before learning the rules, and edit count mean nothing if the edits are mostly maintenance edits or made using automated tools. What matters more is behavior under pressure or during disputes, deep familiarity with the policies and guidelines, experience in administrative areas like AFD and AIV, experience resolving content disputes, examples of where good judgment was demonstrated, and so on. The community decides in a week-long debate. For the candidate, it is a stressful experience.


 * If you are looking to be unblocked, you really need to stay away for six months. The clock restarts whenever you post something. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know

Final Post
I'm just giving a final message and wanting to say that I'm not gonna be coming back on wikipedia ever again. Which means I'm not gonna be active on my wikipedia account anymore, not gonna be editing anymore, because I just absolutely hated what I did, I was a bad wikipedia editior ever since day one if you look at my contribution history. I just don't want to be on wikipedia anymore these days since like I said doing wikipedia is not my type of thing anymore and me being a wikipedia vandal. I don't blame you for blocking me at all since I was given enough warnings to stop and I just kept vandalizing wikipedia regardless of the warnings I was given so this is 100% my decision to leave wikipedia forever.

Your draft article, Draft:David Anthony Ware


Hello, Drhunterhamilton21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Anthony Ware".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  08:46, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cannabis in Libya
Hello, Drhunterhamilton21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cannabis in Libya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)