User talk:Driversfound

Hi, I again deleted the article Louisville Fire & Rescue Pipes and Drums as a copyright violation from. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do the following:
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL. Garion96 (talk) 18:18, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Louisville Fire and Rescue Pipes and Drums
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Louisville Fire and Rescue Pipes and Drums, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://lfrbagpipes.org/history.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Louisville Fire and Rescue Pipes and Drums
A tag has been placed on Louisville Fire and Rescue Pipes and Drums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 19:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
For repeated copyright violations I blocked you for 24 hours. Please read the message I posted above and do not recreate this content without proof of permission. Garion96 (talk) 19:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

You must bereally bored and clueless.