User talk:Drjcaron

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Wywin (talk) 14:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Persistant PulseView ‎/ Quarktet Promotion
http://.Quarktet.com
 * Accounts

Hello,. You may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest including WP:NOPAY. All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People with a close connection to a subject need to be aware of Wikipedia's policies;


 * Conflict of interest
 * Paid advocacy, public relations, and marketing
 * Advertising and conflicts of interest (External Linking)
 * Editors who have a conflict of interest
 * Accounts used for promotion
 * Law Of Unintended Consequences
 * Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view. You may also wish to avoid giving the impression that your account is to be used for promotional purposes. Regardless, doing so does not exempt you from compliance with Wikipedias policies.

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Hu12 (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PulseView concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PulseView, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Dear Hausteurbot,

I have been waiting from a response from the editor who declared this article to be an advertizement. This article was modeled after the wiki pages of competing technologies, (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_%28software%29 for example). It seems inconsistent that the editors would allow one company to post information about its product while preventing another. If there are guidelines for companies, then please post them here.

74.96.188.12 (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)