User talk:Droid733

Enough of some morons ruining this page. This jediism page has contained libel about true jediism for too long. You can post your crap again. I will erase it and keep posting the actual representation of jediism every freaking day if I have. It's also a time to report this malicious activity of people who have been intentionally providing defamatory information.

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Jediism appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Charles (talk) 20:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

What neutrality is in presenting jedi as some morons? What? This is ridicule. If you're going to continue with keeping false and irrelevant information about jediism then I will do what needs be done to end this.

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Jediism. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --EEMIV (talk) 21:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Your restored references have nothing to do with jediism. The guy with hood in market is not jediist. Jedi consenus fenomena has nothing to do with actual jediist movement. I am going to keep removing false information about jediism until this defamatory and irrelevant information is moved to "jedi nuts" page and the actual and correct information will stay.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Syrthiss (talk) 11:52, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.