User talk:Dropthecrap

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk |Sign 13:10, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Wuh Wuz  Dat  13:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Wuh Wuz  Dat  13:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Wuh Wuz  Dat  13:20, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Please leave edits as is, these reflect true facts that the party chooses to ignore.
 * Wikipedia is not a soapbox, take your political agenda elsewhere. Wuh  Wuz  Dat  13:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

The Conservative Party of Canada doesn't control the edits on that page. You are in no position to counter that either. We operate a policy of neutrality – your edits contravened that, and your insistence on having these edits stick (by reinserting them) is what got you blocked. – B.hotep •talk• 14:06, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't think the person who took the information out cares about Canadian politics. Neither do I. I don't even care about politics in the country I live in. What we do care about is edits pushing a certain POV. By the way, don't post a new unblock message every time you want to say something. Just edit below. – B.hotep •talk• 14:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

While I am new at this, I also know that what was placed into the document was correct. If I wait the period of time for the edit ban to resolve, how I able to replace the information, and what is needed to make the changes so my edits are not over written? And to think that there is not a party action here at work is not correct.
 * Wikipedia is not a soapbox. If you come off your block and continue your disruptive edits, you will be blocked for a longer period. --Smashvilletalk 14:50, 6 August 2009 (UTC)