User talk:Drpremrajpushpakaran

Welcome!
Hello, Drpremrajpushpakaran, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Prem Raj Pushpakaran. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  03:43, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Prem Raj Pushpakaran, you may be blocked from editing. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:08, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Prem Raj Pushpakaran, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 10:39, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing by removing AfD templates, as you did at Prem Raj Pushpakaran. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mifter (talk) 15:07, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Dr. Prem Raj P.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dr. Prem Raj P.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dr. Prem Raj P.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Dr. Prem Raj P.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:23, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

potential conflict of interest
Hello, Drpremrajpushpakaran. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- The Red Pen of Doom  10:47, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Prem Raj Pushpakaran


A tag has been placed on Prem Raj Pushpakaran, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.

Likewise, it is not appropriate to keep recreating the content in your user space without working on it to improve the third party sourcing about the subject. -- The Red Pen of Doom  11:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Stop
Please read uw-autobio and stop adding your autobiography. The proper place for it is facebook or linkedin. In any case, your edits to the AfD discussion indicate that you simply do not have the discipline to edit Wikipedia. This edit is particularly worrying - in your academic work do you also pass your own words off as someone else's, or vice versa? A reply would be of interest. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:49, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Block
I have blocked this account. You are still allowed to edit this page and I would very much like you to do so and explain a) why our recommendations against creating autobios do not apply to you and b) in what way your edits to the AfD discussion could be considered constructive. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:16, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Drpremrajpushpakaran for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:15, 16 July 2012 (UTC)