User talk:Drraccoon

Proposed deletion of Polo (Video Game)


The article Polo (Video Game) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTABILITY - there's nothing about this in-development game as described here that makes it notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 22:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

ConcordTV
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your latest version because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. You had no references at all. Note that the station is not an independent third-party source for itself. I see no facts to support notability. How many employees? audience? Turnover? Profits? For all we are told, it could be run by one person in his garage with an audience of three of his mates. Your article just tells us what you offer.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: serving as the city's media center... provides the Concord community with a platform for opinions, news and local information not generally available from commercial media.
 * The fact that you are a non-profit of course doesn't exempt you from our advertising rules.
 * NewTV&mdash;thanks, that's awful. I've tagged for deletion
 * we're a nonprofit You appear to have a conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject, which you are required to declare. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

I can restore your article to a sandbox for you to work on if you wish, but please make sure that you meet our notability criteria as linked above Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:14, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Cosmowrightnarcissa profile.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cosmowrightnarcissa profile.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:08, 31 January 2016 (UTC)