User talk:Drrwebber

Ebxml
Hi Drrwebber. Thanks or contributing an article about ebXML. I did a little poking around, and it turns out that there is already a very nice article about EbXML Architecture. Would you consider merging your information into the other article and creating a redirect? Thanks, and happy editing! --Alan Au 22:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Richard C Johnson
A tag has been placed on Richard C Johnson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 20:30, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Awards of the Association for Computing Machinery
I have nominated awards of the association for computing machinery for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

FairTax
Drrwebber, can you provide some sources for the content added to the FairTax article. Otherwise, it will be removed as WP:OR and WP:SYN. Morphh  (talk) 23:14, 07 June 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article David Webber, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited CAM editor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UML (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CAM editor


The article CAM editor has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No third party sources, no indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 17:50, 27 October 2013 (UTC) MrOllie (talk) 17:50, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of CAM editor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CAM editor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CAM editor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:16, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CAM editor


A tag has been placed on CAM editor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Randor1980 talk•my edits 02:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

CAM editor
I notice that you left a request to undelete your product both on my talk page and at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CAM editor. I removed both. On my talk page because I can't have an article undeleted. At the discussion because it's closed and as you'll notice at the top in bold, red letters it reads, "Please do not modify it". You will have to add a request at Wikipedia:Deletion review. The page suggests that you speak with the closing admin, but in this case, all deletion comments were correct in indicating that the product does not meet notability guidelines. Links in a Google search are not enough. The links must be reliable sources that have extensive coverage of the topic. I still don't see that. Sorry. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)