User talk:Drsachinwellness

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr Sachin Dua (June 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr Sachin Dua and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:32, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Melcous. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 15:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Drsachinwellness


A tag has been placed on User:Drsachinwellness, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &mdash; O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  15:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:YOGA INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE


A tag has been placed on Draft:YOGA INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Melcous (talk) 15:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SwisterTwister  talk  17:16, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 18:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Unblock
Please unblock me, actually I didn't read rules and regulations properly. It will be not done in future again Drsachinwellness (talk) 19:02, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Please unblock me. I didn't read rules properly, it will be not done in future Drsachinwellness (talk) 19:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Three pieces of advice relating to your request to be unblocked.
 * 1) Follow the instructions in the block message above, i.e. post  at the bottom of the page (replacing the words "Your reason here" with a reason for being unblocked"). If you do that your unblock request will be automatically added to the list of pending unblock requests, and sooner or later an administrator will deal with it. Just posting a plain message, without using the unblock template, will not add it to the list, and it is perfectly possible that no administrator will ever see it. (By luck I happened to see it, but I might not have done.)
 * 2) If you are to stand any chance of being unblocked, you will need to do more than just saying "it will be not done in future": you will need to indicate that you understand what was unacceptable about your editing, and how you will edit in the future. Experience over the years shows that when an editor asks to be unblocked and just say things like "it will be not done in future" without saying what won't be done in future, most often they actually don't understand why they are blocked, and if they are unblocked they actually do continue doing the same kind of things.
 * 3) In addition to creating three pages of total marketing copy, you posted the same very long marketing piece into several different articles (in the case of the article Rishikesh, your advertisement was more than a quarter the length of the coverage of the whole of the rest of the city). In view of that, You will have an uphill struggle persuading any administrator that unblocking you will benefit the project, so my advice is to forget about requesting an unblock unless you can write a very convincing account, making it very clear that you will start editing from a neutral point of view about subjects other than your business. It is virtually certain that you will not be unblocked to allow you to continue to write about your business. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)