User talk:Drsadeq

Image copyright problem with Image:Sadeq-2.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Sadeq-2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sadeq.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Sadeq.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sadeq-3.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Sadeq-3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sadeq.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Sadeq.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sadeq-2.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Sadeq-2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sadeq-3.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Sadeq-3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Sadegh Nobari
Sadegh Nobari is a PhD candidate at National University of Singapore (NUS). Now He is a visiting PhD student at EPFL working on the Blue Brain Project. He is a member of the Database Research Lab of NUS. He is supervised by Prof. Stéphane Bressan at NUS, Prof. Anastasia Ailamaki at EPFL and Prof. Panagiotis Karras at Rutgers. His research focuses on parallel graph algorithms with database application. He is graduated as summa cum laude in Computer Engineering from Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST).

Speedy deletion nomination of Sadegh Nobari


A tag has been placed on Sadegh Nobari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DarkAudit (talk) 08:17, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

R-tree
Hello, Drsadeq. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article R-tree, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

A WP:Conflict of interest in particular arises when you add your own latest 2013 publications to Wikipedia, as if they were already an established and widely adopted technique. As a rule of thumb, there should be a book or similar thing somewhere citing your work first. And even then, it would be preferred if someone other than the original authors writes about the work. Thank you. --Chire (talk) 07:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Please stop adding reference spam to Wikipedia, as you have done to multiple articles today. If you continue you may be blocked. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:37, 13 September 2013 (UTC)