User talk:Drsakib

July 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of gravity hills has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:16, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of gravity hills was changed by Drsakib (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891286 on 2017-07-21T13:16:40+00:00.

September 2017
Hello, I'm Eurodyne. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Myanmar— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. eurodyne (talk) 19:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Myanmar, you may be blocked from editing. JimRenge (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about SWED university
Hello, Drsakib,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether SWED university should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/SWED university.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 00:46, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SWED university


A tag has been placed on SWED university, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 06:42, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Their own website states "At [Business Name], we are focused on providing __________ services with the highest levels of customer satisfaction". I don't think you can blame Wikipedia for not finding them notable when they apparently don't find themselves notable. Please don't re-create the article again until there are reliable, verifiable, independent sources to show the university's notability or you may find yourself unable to create the article ever again. Cabayi (talk) 06:47, 23 January 2019 (UTC)