User talk:Drsanth

August 2016
Hello, I'm Marvellous Spider-Man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kodagu Gowda have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Marvellous Spider-Man (talk) 18:42, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kodagu Gowda. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kodagu Gowda was changed by Drsanth (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930205 on 2016-08-08T13:24:01+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kodagu Gowda, you may be blocked from editing. Marvellous Spider-Man (talk) 15:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello. Your recent edit to List of people from Karnataka appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:02, 8 June 2017 (UTC)