User talk:Drshishaozhong

Speedy deletion nomination of Fully automated GIS


A tag has been placed on Fully automated GIS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Yasht101 (talk) 08:19, 5 February 2012 (UTC)


 * As well as spam you are likely to be violating our policies on COI and original research if you try to add an article on this subject. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:41, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Surprise
I am so surprise to know the page got deleted. It presents new knowledge and findings. It presents facts. I have put one reference to start with. I did indicate more details to come forward. I can understand that new knowledge and innovations may take time for people to know about or understand. I think that deleting it, without notifying the author and discussing and finding out the fact, is rather over-reacting. That is my humble opinion. Sincerely, Dr. Shaozhong SHI


 * "It presents new knowledge and findings." That is an admission that it is original research. There is no obligation for us to notify authors before deletion and in any case the article was so short it was hardly worth notifying you. We do what we like. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushbugled13 (talk) 02:48, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Mephistophelian (contact)  08:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shaozhong Shi


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:00, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/First Ph.D Work on Tsunami in the UK concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/First Ph.D Work on Tsunami in the UK, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:47, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/First Ph.D Work on Tsunami in the UK


Hello Drshishaozhong. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "First Ph.D Work on Tsunami in the UK".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:02, 25 December 2013 (UTC)