User talk:Drsjpdc/archive1

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Wuh Wuz  Dat  22:48, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Stephen J. Press
A tag has been placed on Dr. Stephen J. Press requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  22:48, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for [%endent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. ? Add them, or rewrite the material using them, and omitting the family details. & see  our guide to writing Wikipedia articles.  DGG ( talk ) 04:02, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Howard Press
I have nominated Howard Press, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Howard Press. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:47, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn, with apologies. I misread the dates on the patent applications of Press and Hans Lowey to assume Lowey was the first inventor.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of International Academy of Olympic Chiropractic Officers
A tag has been placed on International Academy of Olympic Chiropractic Officers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Iaoco


The article Iaoco has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable group.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of International Federation of Sports Chiropractic


The article International Federation of Sports Chiropractic has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable group.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Conflicts of interest
You were notified on 18 August 2009 about the potential conflicts of interest represented in your first article (which, based on your own user name, is almost certainly an autobiography). Since that time, you had introduced or modified several other articles (Howard Press, International Federation of Sports Chiropractic, International Academy of Olympic Chiropractic Officers, Iaoco, Time Release Technology (medicine), all of which represent further conflicts of interest. Please read and understand the conflict of interest guidelines before making any more edits to Wikipedia.  Failure to comply with these policies may result in your account being blocked from further editing.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:58, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dr. Stephen J. Press


The article Dr. Stephen J. Press has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * notability claimed but not borne out in facts presented, nor can any verification of notability be found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Dr. Stephen J. Press
I have nominated Dr. Stephen J. Press, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Dr. Stephen J. Press. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Iaoco
I have nominated Iaoco, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Iaoco. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:34, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of International Federation of Sports Chiropractic
I have nominated International Federation of Sports Chiropractic, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/International Federation of Sports Chiropractic. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
 Ron h jones (Talk) 22:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Federation Internationale de Chiropratique du Sport
A tag has been placed on Federation Internationale de Chiropratique du Sport requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bongo  matic  01:17, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Federation Internationale de Chiropratique du Sports


The article Federation Internationale de Chiropratique du Sports has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Improper disambiguation page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Federation INternationale de Chiropratique du Sport
A tag has been placed on Federation INternationale de Chiropratique du Sport, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:25, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fédération Internationale de Chiropratique du Sport
A tag has been placed on Fédération Internationale de Chiropratique du Sport, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I believe that a third party biography of me was removed unfairly...

It appears to me that in punishment for having committed the innocent sin of creating an AUTO-biography, that any third party who knows me and wants to post a BIOgraphy, is now stopped from doing  so. After my AUTO was deleted, due primarily to its being an AUTO biography, an acquaintance who heard about the deletion, was indignant about that, and asked for my bio information so HE could re-post it. This time he included references to valid third party published articles about my career and those were ignored and the page was deleted again, as "a repost of a previously deleted page"....

As to the allegation of "Notability issues".... someone  saw one of the references to one of the  books I published  (hello, this makes me an author).. and ignored the references to http://www.chiroweb.com, which is an online archive of published articles about Doctors of Chiropractic. There are at least ten good articles there about involvement at the World level  in Sports medicine, as well as in my profession generally. Moreover, there is an uncontested page about one Jana Bellin, MD, who took over the post of Chair, of the FIDE  medical  commission I CREATED for H.E., Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, President of FIDE and the Republic of Kalmykia,who hired me. I was appointed by the Minister of Sport of the USSR to serve as Chief Physician of the USSR Winter Olympic team... making Olympic and Chiropractic history....  but HER page  remains...  so....  it seems that MD's go to the same number of  years of school as DC's but all of them are only in practice for the benefit of mankind, but DC's are all only around to "self-promote" and to "promote their own profession".. (there were the slanderous comments from one of the editors who deleted by BIO page the second time around.

So, my question is: Does the fact  that I erred by posting an AUTO biography, mean that  no one can now post  my BIOgraphy??? And how do we fix this grave injustice? I really do not understand, unless the AMA is behind this. Please help!!

Drsjpdc (talk) 16:37, 24 September 2009 (UTC)


 * You were blocked because you repeatedly added articles of the same kind without trying to address the issues why they were repeatedly deleted. Your block has been expired by now so you can edit again but you are strongly advised to read our conflict-of-interest guideline as well as Your first article, which will tell you about the most important things to take care of when writing a new article. Regards  So Why  16:48, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

You have not read what I have written...  this does NOT answer my inquiry.

I need to understand why rules are not being applied to me the same way they are to others. The repost was NOT from ME.... thus it was not an autobiography It DID answer the problems of the initial deletion, in that it had valid third party references, and it DID demonstrate  "notability"  as explained above...

So what was the problem with the third party BIO entered that posted my bio? Regards, Drsjpdc (talk) 16:53, 24 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, this is just to let you know that I've read your helpme message, and I'll be replying soon. I'm reading through your article right now so I can provide suggestions. ƒ(Δ)² 17:15, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, I just read through the article, and the sources given. I won't comment on your block, I'm not an admin. First of all, you claim to be the founder of the International Federation of Sports Chiropractic (Fédération Internationale de Chiropratique Sportive (FICS)). This seems to be incorrect. According to this link, you were a past president of the organization. This, coupled with your claim to being the "chief Physician for the USSR Olympic team" might make you notable, but I can't find any reliable, third-party (and NOT self-published) sources. Emphasis on the "reliable" part here, I can find quite a few "unreliable" sources. I'd encourage you to rewrite your article, complete with sources, and post it here: User:Drsjpdc (your user space). Then, go to New contributors' help page and post a message, asking someone to review your article. Also, read through WP:COI, your article might be rejected on those grounds. Your block has expired, so you are free to edit. You can post any further questions on my talk page, or on yours, though I might not reply for the next 12 hours (I'm logging out). Someone else might drop by to help though. Cheers, ƒ(Δ)² 17:37, 24 September 2009 (UTC)


 * In Dr. Press' defense, the FICS link given reports Press as its "first president". One may safely presume that the first president of an organization is the founder (or one of the founders).  I wouldn't call that fact incorrect.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for finally seeing the light.... (and thanks WikiDan for that... you're right, of course.. but there's more) There were  people who assumed control of the FICS who tried valiantly to wipe my memory from the founding, due to the probability that one day, someone is likely to receive the Olympic Order (in Gold), and they were  frankly jealous. At one point I had to threaten to file a complain with the Court of Arbitration of Sport, in Lausanne, and then I was given a letter that shows that it was accepted that I am the Founder. They even printed cards for me with that title. I have another affidavit, signed by all the other living charter signers (except the one who tried to take my name  from this), that attests that I am the rightful Founder. It is really not an issue anymore, it is accepted fact by the vast majority of the membership. The recent change to admin in Toronto and a new website left the word "Founder" off the new site... check out http://web.archive.org/web/20040318043829/http://www.fics-online.org/  where I am clearly, finally named as "Founder"....  As to the Chief Physician  of the USSR Olympic team, see  http://www.drpress.com/Documents/CCCP.pdf  for PROOF, i.e.  a letter to the first President Bush from the Minister of Sport of the USSR....enough? I have Mr. Bush' response too... it's just a framed signed photo, and on my wall. I also founded and still chair the online agency, IAOCO.org, see who else sits on that board  with me.

Thanks for the help, this seemed so unfair.

Drsjpdc (talk) 15:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I see that you have begun reconstructing your autobiography. Have you learned nothing?  Please refer again to WP:COI and WP:AUTO.  You should not write your own biography for Wikipedia.  And you really shouldn't recreate your autbbiography after it has already been deleted.  Yes, I set the record straight as to Aditya's mistake that you were not the founder of FICS.  However, since the FICS article has been deleted (repeatedly) as not being notable, your founding of that organization does nothing to bolster your notability.   WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

I reposted the page, becasue of what Adithya told me... "I'd encourage you to rewrite your article, complete with sources, and post it here: User:Drsjpdc (your user space). Then, go to Wikipedia:New contributors' help page and post a message, asking someone to review your article."

So, I am following those instructions. Please do not block me again for listening to the only one who actually read the article. ````

Tryng to get it right

 * While COI editing is strongly discouraged (read: very, very strongly) it is not prohibited, as long as your article follows the policies WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:N, and WP:NOT. In its current state your article cannot be accepted, as it reads mostly like a resume, and is not written from a NPOV. This, coupled with your (or any of your friends') conflict of interest, is detrimental to your article. That's why WP:COI is cited so often; it is extremely hard to write articles about yourself from a neutral point of view. A quick glance through your article reveals some of the offending phrases:
 * Dr. Press is himself multi-lingual, and an accomplished cellist.
 * He is probably the individual most single-handedly responsible for bringing Chiropractic services
 * Breaks new ground in Sports medicine
 * and no other DC has to this day been so honored.
 * and Dr. Press took on a very unpopular job. It was he who had to convince the World's Chess players that it was necessary to "pee in a cup" for Chess.


 * One way to see if an article has been written from a neutral point of view or not, is to read it and try to figure out if the person supports or is against the article's subject. The author of your article (you) very clearly supports the subject (again, you).


 * Lastly, your article is a biography of a living person. The standards for BLPs are much stricter than the standards for normal articles. Your article must be very well sourced with reliable sources (<-- Please read this link! It's very important!). Until that's done, all statements that are likely to be challenged can and will be removed by people (like me..) who patrol BLP articles.


 * Oh, I just noticed your questions at the bottom. Jana Bellin is a Chess Grandmaster, that makes her notable per the guidelines for sports, which are different from the guidelines applicable to you. Additionally, notability is not relative, saying "I'm notable because she is" has never really been an accepted argument. And secondly, you're right. Calvin Klein's article is not neutral, I'll take care of that in a while. Neutrality happens to be something I'm good at.


 * Regards, ƒ(Δ)² 05:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I'd add that you seem to be placing much reliance on other articles existing to which you are comparing your article and using that finding to say, in essence, "but see these other articles exist with the same problems, why can't mine." There is no central authority that applies policy and guideline consistently and at the same time. Rather, we are a collection of thousands and thousands of separate and individual volunteers, each editing by his or her own lights. Thus, issues in an article (such as blatant advertising) may be addressed moments after the article's creation, while another article with very similar issues may not be focused on by anyone for months or even years. So generalizing from any one article's existence or state to conclude something about other articles is a logic that often doesn't work well here. See, by way of analogy, What about article x?.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 06:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Fuhghettaboutit; I got your point... there are now plenty of valid, third party references and documents in the page. Drsjpdc (talk) 19:23, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * There are an awful lot of article on Wikipedia, and I haven't gotten to rewriting all of them yet. If you want to help, it would be more helpful to fix up one of the existing ones than to add another biased one. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:08, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Adithya... thanks so much for your "neutral" point of view.... I have removed all the statements you commented about.... and of course, you are right about all that. It IS very hard to be neutral when one writes about oneself. Please understand that, as I said in other writing, there are people in my own field who have for 20 years been working to erase all my contributions to my profession... by slander, character assassination and simply plagiarizing my life's work. If I don't have SOME venue in which to set the record straight, they may succeed. I KNOW that people dedicating themselves to do what you and your colleagues do, CANNOT stand for that kind of dishonesty.

Frankly, as to the extent of the page; the first incarnation was far more modest, but apparently failed to convince your colleagues that my life is notable. This version goes far beyond what I would have initially done, but I think, even from a neutral opinion point of view, I have proven my case for recognition.

AS to the Citations from Chiroweb.com; this is an online archive of articles from a publication in Calif. that goes to every known DC on the planet. They have Editorial review and the articles I cited were NOT written by me; and furthermore, I have absolutely NO relationship with them, their ownership or their Board. There are admittedly few other outside publications which routinely publish anything that Doctors of Chiropractic do, unless we get indicted for something. :( I have also provide links to documents which certainly prove my statements.

What more can I do to this to merit its re-posting?

Drsjpdc (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * There are still strong sourcing issues which haven't been taken care of. If you wish I can copy every sentence that should be sourced and post it here, and you can search for sources, or I could rewrite the article for you. The result will be a much shorter article, but it'll fit the guidelines. Assuming, of course, that all claims to notability have reliable sources. The rewritten article will be much less impressive, as sentences like "He is 2nd Cousin, and genealogist to Calvin Klein, and 1st Cousin (5 gen. Rem.) to the Composer and cellist, Jacques Offenbach." can't be written without sources, and I doubt any source covers your family history. And one more thing, there is no agenda on Wikipedia that is preventing you from posting your article. We all follow policy. Your article isn't the only one that's been deleted. Check out the deletion log to see how many article are deleted every minute. ƒ(Δ)² 08:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This is the first draft. I haven't completed the Professional Career section. Could you give me sources for the Chess, Roller sports, and Team Doctor claims listed here? I tried searching on the respective sites, but I can't seem to find your name anywhere. Thanks, ƒ(Δ)² 08:38, 28 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Couple of things, scanned documents in themselves are not reliable sources for the qualifications to which they purport to relate, so those "references" will have to be removed per WP:V. Second, and more importantly, at the moment I don't see any claim of notability in the draft. Merely being an Olympic team's chiropractor is not notable as I read WP:BIO. I am happy to be persuaded otherwise, but unless this is significantly beefed up before moving to mainspace, it will headed to AFD when moved. – ukexpat (talk) 16:26, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Drsjpdc
A tag has been placed on User:Drsjpdc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 16:28, 28 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I have tagged this for speedy deletion because it clearly does not comply with the user page guidelines and is basically a c.v. – ukexpat (talk) 16:30, 28 September 2009 (UTC)


 * OK per WP:UP, I have moved it to a user subpage at User:Drsjpdc/Stephen J. Press. – ukexpat (talk) 17:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Tim Song (talk) 13:29, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Helpme
I'll be inactive for the next few days, so I need someone to help Drsjpdc with his article, and provide him guidance (basically continue what I was doing). Drs's talk page + the messages left on my talk page (my talk page history) should provide enough information. Thank you. Drsjpdc: I'll be back in a week, so it's best if someone takes over this issue. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. ƒ(Δ)² 17:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Drsjpdc I see that you've had a few problems on Wikipedia, so I encourage you to please ask for help whenever you need to - and especially if you are in any doubts over anything. It's always best to ask and check things, for example before creating a page you could get someone to check it over.

If you have any questions at all, please put here, at the end of your talk page, followed by your question, and someone will come along and answer it.

You can also get help live, with this or this.

Best wishes,  Chzz  ►  17:34, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Redirects
Hi, if you want to create a redirect, please do so by clicking the button in your toolbar that looks like this: #R. Then type the title you want to redirect to between the brackets. That's all you have to do. &lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 23:19, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your vigilance... got it... Drsjpdc (talk) 23:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)