User talk:Dru of Id/Archives/2012/June

Thank you!
For your comment. :) You made a friend today. Benkenobi18 (talk) 09:59, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
For your help. I do have another question. Yesterday I made my first few edits. They were very minor. One was a change to one word and the other two were just adding citations/sources to make the article better. However, I completely forgot to add the edit summary to them. Is there a way to add the edit summary now? I searched around and couldn't find any instructions or help section explaining this. Thanks so much for your help. Tattoodwaitress (talk) 14:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
For your help. I do have another question. Yesterday I made my first few edits. They were very minor. One was a change to one word and the other two were just adding citations/sources to make the article better. However, I completely forgot to add the edit summary to them. Is there a way to add the edit summary now? I searched around and couldn't find any instructions or help section explaining this. Thanks so much for your help. Tattoodwaitress (talk) 14:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Editor in need of help
Hi Dru: Could you please delete the reference to Harry Dennis website that is located on the sidebar underneath his picture or instruct me how to access it and remove it? I am having trouble accessing that section.

What needs to be deleted is www.harrydennis.com Thank you.--DA01 02:00, 3 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I closed the help tag, as it should be on the talk page of the editor asking for help, not here. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:52, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

About Joan Of Arc
Saint Joan Of Arc Was Real Her Sacrifice Was Real She Was A True National Heroine Not folk heroine I Sincerely Request admin to change this Please change From folk heroine To National Heroine Please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.233.76 (talk) 09:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

AFD: Phillip Goldfeder
Thanks, I thought he held local office, not State Assembley. I made a Non-Administrative closure to keep the article. Thanks again! Electriccatfish2 (talk) 21:27, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Lexi Love
I don't know if you saw my request at the Help Desk or not but thanks for watching the Lexi Love article the last several hours. Dismas |(talk) 11:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I cycle through a lot of the help areas, so I saw it there. The factoid and its pdf source should be checked, but the 9.5.0 Adobe Reader 'upgrade' broke my ability to read pdf files, and cycles attempting to 'fix' itself often enough to eat my internet usage. I've watchlisted fewer than a handful of articles, so I review from my contributions occasionally. Dru of Id (talk) 11:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Rudolph Schwarz (sculptor)
I may have done it the wrong way, but I was trying to disambiguate him from these other Rudolph Schwarzes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Schwarz BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 20:04, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

AFD Matthew Hiltzik
Thank you for your comments regarding the deletion. I do appreciate when people explain themselves as you did, as I am then able to understand your point in a more clear fashion. I do believe that this page meets the standards and requirements of Wikipedia, and I am not just saying that because of the edits I have made on the article over the year. I do wish to work with other editors in order to keep the article. GD23 (talk) 14:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I have no problem with editors trying to understand and meet Wikipedia's sometimes nebulous requirements; if an article is kept it should be because it deserves to be kept, and this is right on the line of deletion / closing as no consensus versus meeting WP:GNG, which defaults to keep for now with leave for renomination. You could request userfication so that you'll be able to polish it for up to a year without time pressure, and return it to articlespace after additional coverage can be included. Dru of Id (talk) 15:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * What happens if a consensus is not reached? GD23 (talk) 15:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I could have organized that better:

/ closing as no consensus (which defaults to keep for now with leave for renomination) versus meeting WP:GNG. Dru of Id (talk) 15:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * How does the article achieve WP:GNG? GD23 (talk) 16:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Sufficient national/international coverage that doesn't clearly meet Notability (people), but which consensus determines meets the guidelines based on amount/timespan/diversity of coverage. Dru of Id (talk) 16:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I will be sure to mention this thought in the discussion. GD23 (talk) 16:46, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
 Theopolisme TALK 15:09, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Ping.  Theopolisme TALK 15:28, 30 June 2012 (UTC)