User talk:Drumawheyboy

Could you tell me if you know any thing about the history Non-subscribing Presbyterian? and how you are able to state that there is a shared common roster with the ministers of NSPCI and the  British General Assembly of Unitarian? It is important that you have the true facts. what I ask is that you could / would print them. As a Non-subscribing Presbyterian I know the truth that not all ministers of the NSPCI study at GAUFCC ministerial colleges. It would be most helpful to the readership that you state that fact. You may use the folowing lines as a starting point.

NSPCI
Not all Non-subscribing Presbyterian Ministers keep a close contact with the Unitarians nor are  identified as such. There is no such shared common roster with the ministers of the  British General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches and Non-subscribing Presbyterian Ministers and only a few have  study at GAUFCC ministerial colleges.

I noticed you have copied the same paragraph into multiple articles. This probably is a bad idea in most cases, as the text does not fit with the rest of the article (eg this alters the meaning with the second paragraph no longer making sense). It would also be important to cite the source for your claim. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns, --TeaDrinker (talk) 15:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)


 * You really need to slow down and discuss your changes on the talk pages of various articles. You are deleting large sections of valid material in a manner that amounts to vandalism. This needs to stop. ✤ JonHarder talk 20:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * You really need to propose your changes on the talk pages of the articles you want to change. I am not finding your changes helpful, but maybe other editors will have have other ideas. As suggested above, citing your source will help immensely. ✤ JonHarder talk 04:03, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * You're edits seem to indicate a strong desire to indicate that non subscribing Presbyterians are affiliated with the Unitarians. I can appreciate that, although perhaps we can find a way to work it into the text, rather than just adding this disclaimer-style paragraph.  I'm not really an expert in this field; is the number of non-subscribing Presbyterians who don't "keep close contact" very large?  Thanks, --TeaDrinker (talk) 16:26, 3 March 2010 (UTC)