User talk:Druxe

November 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 17:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * is being friendly; please consider this your only warning. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 17:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Do you have some sort of browser add-on that changes "Trump" to "Drumpf"? --Neil N  talk to me 17:49, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes I do, but that was from a long time ago and I made sure to type Trump each time.


 * Woah, woah, woah. A block? "persistent disruptive editing"?  Druxe just has an annoying browser extension installed.  This has happened about a dozen time that I've seen.  All you need to do is explain to them.  Their other edits look useful, this doesn't seem to be a problematic account.


 * Druxe, you need to remove the Drumpf browser extension before you edit another page; the extension changes all instances of Trump to Drumpf in the edit window too, so you're changing the article. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * It's still active. Example. Please fix whatever is causing this and then you'll be unblocked. --Neil N  talk to me 17:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

I see, thank you Floquenbean and Neil. I removed the extension completely, is it possible to remove my block? I sincerely apologize and meant no harm and I'd like to re-add the information I previously tried to add.
 * While Neil is unblocking: please don't re-add the info about the rape accusation before getting consensus for it on the article talk page; it's been discussed there before and I believe there was consensus to take it out. You can look through the talk page archives, there's a search box there on the talk page. That page is subject to quite a lot of conflict so WP:BOLD doesn't really apply there the way it does at other pages. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Please edit this page again to make sure Trump doesn't change. --Neil N  talk to me 17:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

This is an example edit. Thank you again. I will not re-add it in that case, Floquenbeam.
 * You are unblocked. Sorry about the inconvenience but as you can understand, we need to be very vigilant about making sure these types of articles are not defaced today. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 18:02, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Of course, I apologize. I removed the extension and I'll be careful to make sure I don't mess anything up.


 * My apologies for the warning; I didn't know such a thing existed(the browser extension). Best wishes to you 331dot (talk) 18:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * , I have a browser extension that automatically adds "they're a rapist" to every article I edit. I keep forgetting to turn it off. Can I please be let off the hook too? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This is the stupidest false equivalency I've seen in a while. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:43, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * How so? I mean, in both cases editors are using browser plugin that vandalize Wikipedia pages. Shouldn't editors be held responsible for such conduct? I mean, it's not like the Drumpf plugin accomplishes anything useful for its users. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 21:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Druxe was held responsible. Why else would they be blocked? Once the problem went away, they were unblocked. Blocks are designed to stop current or potential future disruption. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 21:33, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I understand. I just don't think we should be cutting editors slack for this sort of behavior. Sorry, I should have pinged, who opposed the block, not you. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, I'm ViperSnake151. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mr. Peanut have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. ''This was just an advertising campaign, one that has been halted out of sensitivity. '' ViperSnake151   Talk  20:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)