User talk:Druxus

Notability of White Owl Winery
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on White Owl Winery, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because White Owl Winery seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting White Owl Winery, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of White Owl Winery


The article White Owl Winery has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article fails to meet inclusion criteria specified by WP:CORP, WP:N, as well as WP:WINERY. Notability is not established by winning awards in non-notable wine events (see WP:WINEVENT). Independent secondary coverage fails WP:SIGCOV; not significant compared to any other winery or local restaurant. Weak claim of notability re commercial production of pawpaw wine, but pawpaw wine is neither unusual nor unique.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)