User talk:Ds303

Boldface
Please go through the MOS:BOLDFACE policy. There are very few things that you can have a bold text in an article, for example, article titles and redirects. You cannot bold parts of articles based on personal preferences like you did here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * @Ds303 There is an ongoing discussion here - Newbie User / IP range not adhering to MOS:BOLDFACE and MO:ITALICS. Please participate before you edit any further. -- DaxServer (talk) 11:34, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm DaxServer. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   -- DaxServer (talk) 15:57, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Your edit to Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information.    EN  - Jungwon  15:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Now he is reverting to far older versions, like this. Please keep an eye on him. Kailash29792 (talk)  09:29, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Pyaasa
Why are you removing the poster from it? Moreover, please adhere to WP:OVERLINK. Kailash29792 (talk)  02:17, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:48, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Since you have engaged in block evasion as User talk:2405:204:A52B:A255:0:0:5E:F8A4 I am increasing the block to 1 week. I considered indefinite. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 03:42, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Also, any administrator may alter this block without consulting me. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 04:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Dilip Kumar. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.   Kylo Ren III  (talk ☎️) 04:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Dilip Kumar, you may be blocked from editing.  Where is the source to verify that Dilip Kumar's method acting predates Marlon Brando's? Kylo Ren III  (talk ☎️) 04:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Citation no 97 is the proof. And there are numerous others that I can provide to prove that fact that Dilip Kumar was true pioneer of method acting predating Marlon Brando who started acting only in 1950s Ds303 (talk) 05:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dilip Kumar.   Kylo Ren III  (talk ☎️) 05:43, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dilip Kumar.   Kylo Ren III  (talk ☎️) 20:03, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dilip Kumar.   Kylo Ren III  (talk ☎️) 17:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dilip Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

MOS:EUPHEMISM
You have been adding a lot of this at Dilip Kumar. "He died", not, "He passed away". Kylo Ren III (talk ☎️) 17:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Please also see Wikipedia's policies on WP:RELIABLESOURCES and MOS:PUFFERY. Kylo Ren III  (talk ☎️) 17:47, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dilip Kumar, you may be blocked from editing.   Kylo Ren III  (talk ☎️) 03:47, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Speedy deletion nomination of Tarak Nath Gandhi


A tag has been placed on Tarak Nath Gandhi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Taukeerppw (talk) 11:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:41, 17 November 2022 (UTC)