User talk:Ds5251

Speedy deletion nomination of Olivercat
Hello Ds5251,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Olivercat for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tco03displays (talk) 02:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Boovabee
Hello Ds5251,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Boovabee for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tco03displays (talk) 03:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Boovabee


The article Boovabee has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable neologism

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigPimpinBrah (talk) 03:09, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Boovabee for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boovabee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Boovabee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BigPimpinBrah (talk) 04:28, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Boovabee. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. BigPimpinBrah (talk) 23:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Ds5251, you are invited to the Teahouse
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Anhui cuisine. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 17:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)