User talk:Dsagargcb

Nomination of ChessBase India for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ChessBase India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ChessBase India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 20:34, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

ChessBase India
Hi Misty:)

I have added categories to my article. i think this is the only missing piece in it right? Please let me know if I am following guidelines lay down by wiki. Happy to help.

Thanks, DG

Your account and editing
Hello there! I saw your message at the talk page of ChessBase India's Deletion discussion. It gives the impression that this account represents a company rather than a single person. Wikipedia requires that each edit made here be the responsibility of a single person even if they are editing for a company. So, you'll need to abide by one person per account. Secondly, you need to disclose your conflict of interest as per the instructions at WP:PAID. You should have taken part in the deletion discussion. Coming back after the discussion is over doesn't help. After you make sure only one editor is editing from one account and disclosing your interests, you can start a draft and submit it through the WP:AFC process, which is what you should have done in the first place. Paid editors should not be creating articles directly at all. If you had used the AFC process, you would have received feedback and given an opportunity to improve the draft, and deletion would not have been necessary. However, if all published sources that there are on the company were already in the article you created, there may be little point. Editors looked at the available sources and deemed them insufficient. So, it is unlikely it will be reconsidered unless there are more sources. I was actually surprised that there weren't; so I am sure there will be given time. Finally, do note that Wikipedia is NOT FOR PROMOTION. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 14:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)