User talk:Dsannella/ThreadSafe

I have a conflict of interest, as co-founder of the company that produces ThreadSafe. However I have written the article in a neutral tone, containing factual information. The reason for writing the article is to support inclusion of ThreadSafe in the Java category of List of tools for static code analysis, alongside other tools that do analogous things. I welcome feedback, especially on how I can make this more acceptable for Wikipedia if it isn't already okay. There are already articles in Wikipedia on other static analysis tools that are less neutral in style than this one.

I expect that the list of references will soon be increased by the substitution of a different newspaper article that will provide stronger support what I have written. At that point I would like to move the article into Wikipedia and add the link from List of tools for static code analysis. Dsannella (talk) 18:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)dsannella

Added link to another article that supports what I have written. Will now try to move the article into Wikipedia. Once it's there, I'll add the link from List of tools for static code analysis. I'd be grateful for feedback rather than deletion, in case this article is judged as violating Wikipedia standards - yes, I have a conflict of interest, but there is factual information here that is relevant to readers of that other article. Dsannella (talk) 13:37, 1 May 2013 (UTC)