User talk:Dsgm3r/Gold digger

Hey there, The lead part of the article has a good definition, though it does not include an overview of the article. The content is all relevant, but it seems there is not a lot of in-depth information. The information as it stands is neutral, but there is not a whole lot of information in the music section vs. film. It may also be helpful to add in some more recent photos and people. Overall, I think adding more up to date information, photos, and sources is a great addition to this article.

peer review 10.02.22
The beginning of the article isn't even a lead, or a clerical definition. It makes a lot of assumptions about who a gold digger is, and how their relationships work. A good lead would be informational and provide a bit of historical context.

The content of the work needs a lot of improvement. There's mentioning of this historical background and when this term started getting thrown around, but it makes presumptions about the market of the world and doesn't update with the trend.

I love there are personal examples of people called gold diggers, but I need to know the context surrounding why. That would be something easy and impactful to add in.

There is also little reference to Kayne West's song with the same name, which honestly has a huge impact on how we view the term in culture today. I think that may deserve it's own section on cultural impact in the 21st century.

Basically, a lot of this is "here are all these women that we think are gold diggers, and here's where the word has been referenced". while the tone and content are neutral, this article could be exponentially impacted by expanding on the current cultural impact.

The photos/media are also very old, there should be plenty of stock images that can be added to this.

Over all, I think this is an interesting topic and you all have a lot to pick from and add in! This article is very early 20th century/white women based, so it would be really cool to see the intersectionality of gold digging. Karleeseek (talk) 02:08, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

peer review
Lead: The current lead section is relevant and concise but needs to be updated to include descriptions of the content that will be discussed later in the article. Etymology and Usage: This section could possibly include more information about the word's historical usage. For example, expound on how and why it was used in Rex Beach's book. Society and Culture: This section should definitely be updated with more relevant content and contemporary examples. Organization: The article mentions a couple of different times when the term rose to prominence but I think for organizational purposes a section should be dedicated to discussing this. Content: I suggest adding more information about how the term gold digger is used in hip-hop as well as how this sexual script is used specifically against Black women. The term is heavily racialized and I think that is important to discuss. In general, the article is concise, well organized, and balanced but it has some places it could be improved Kailynhill721 (talk) 03:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)