User talk:Dsoneil

Regarding Alberta Premium, etc
Your article, Alberta Premium, is a candidate for Speedy Deletion since it consists solely of an external link. Please attempt to improve the article and place on the top of the page once you improve it. Also, your article Royal Reserve is a candidate for Speedy Deletion too since it only has the title as its content. Follow the above advice too. Sincerely, Logical2u (Wikibreak) 20:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  MrOllie (talk) 16:41, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Milkshake, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Discuss this on the article's talk page please. Per WP:BRD it is up to you to discuss the material and attempt to get consensus to include once it has been undone. Do not continue to restore it. And please read WP:RS and WP:OR. The page you are citing appears to b your own website.'' Meters (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * This is not the first time you have been warned about citing your own work. Meters (talk) 21:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Milkshake; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 04:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.