User talk:Dstoli1770

Your edits
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.

Moreover, most of the information that you are including is not suitable for Wikipedia, we are not writing a linkfarm. Please read through the policies and guidelines linked from the above templates, and reconsider your edits. --Dirk Beetstra T C 16:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

My apologies, I am not trying to have an edit war with you. I am stopping all edits. Please do what you have too. I am not familiar with this process and am researching wikipedia rules to be informed so as not to break the rules. I will hand off this project to Vanbros.com who are agents for Alexis. They initially set this up. I was just trying to assist with adding the information. I hope Vanbros.com knows what they are doing. I'm done. Thank you, David.


 * Then they for sure have a conflict of interest, and should not be editing the page directly. --Dirk Beetstra T  C 19:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

I understand now. Alexis and I will not intentionally violate your CIO policy and Vanbros.com will not be allowed to edit the page. The Biography posted by me was directly emailed to me by Alexis Railsback just minutes before I placed it on the page, at her request. I will explain the Alexis that only she is to be editing her information and that for anyone else to do so is a COI. Please bring to my attention anything else Alexis or I should be aware of so as not to violate the Wikipedia rules or policies. I will continue to research the rules to assist Alexis in what is and is not permitted. Thank you, David

3RR
I am going to ask you to undo your own edits per the following warning:

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You have reinstated, without discussion or anything, links and galleries that have been removed more than 3 times by now. Those links and galleries are inappropriate in this way per our policies and guidelines. --Dirk Beetstra T C 18:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

- what do you think about unblocking this user? Possibly unblock on the condition he doesn't directly edit the article, and only edits logged in? PhilKnight (talk) 16:30, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Fine with me if they agree to those conditions. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  18:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 19:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Blocked
I've blocked this account as the user did not comply with the unblock conditions. PhilKnight (talk) 20:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)