User talk:Dstroni

I react. You react. We react together to empower our division.
Division of citizens to distract from large scale societal transgressions that are increasingly at risk of being discovered and are otherwise discernible with acuity and intuition.

When we fight; what do we notice about the person placing bets on who wins? When we oppose each other; do we care if neither of our positions serves us?

Do we only want to win?

My hypothesis is that the simple act of taking a position in the political battle between citizens releases our power as freely thinking people and grants permission to the larger political system to choose what concerns us.

Our society, not limited by international borders, is made of interactions with other people. Each interaction causes a change to those we effect, changing them and us. Those affected change others, who change others and so on. If enough people are changed in a specific way, they can organize, galvanize that change in themselves and change others more effectively. However, the common bond created by this partnership causes a loss of critical thinking about any idea that is not common to the organized group, whether logical or not. Also, as the group gets larger, the authentic thought changes in an individual get considered inversely.

Enter the modern, American political theatre of the U. S. A.

Two very strong narratives are presented to the citizens of our country at every Presidential election. Any other narrative is pushed aside as a wasted effort or invalid perspective. Most subscribe to all, or the majority, of these prepared storylines. The less attractive the opinion a person has aligned with, (an opinion which is mostly presented to serve a powerhouse minority agenda), the more aggressively one defends it. This is never more evident than our current, two-party presidential election. If a person does not subscribe to one of the major narratives, there is no obvious third choice.

I propose a position that is more valuable. I propose your actual position, with no concession for a duplicate anger system.

Aggressive opposition to each other as citizens of a voting public can be changed by a complete withdrawal from the voting process.

The message about our system would be loud and clear. Dstroni (talk) 08:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)